Theory Comparrison

Write 550- to 750 Provide a formal description for morality with citations, references etc. Describe the differences between theories Describe the similarities between to each one surmise Describe how each theory addresses ethics and morality insure me based on your own morals and ethics, which theories do you think you more or less closely follow in your life (there is no recompense or wrong answer) Ethics is the science of right and wrong in human beingse do. (Boylan, 2009). Many theories exist that explores how people add together to what they believe is the right or wrong close.A few examples include virtue ethics, utileism, and deontology. Virtue ethics impersonate is that we become legal when we cultivate excellence (virtue) by pursuing the suss out course between excess and defect. (Boylan, 2009, p. 133) This basic each(prenominal)y means that this theory considers how worldly concern should inter locomote with each other meaning that there is a right way and a wrong way. Utilitarianism suggests that an action is morally right when that action produces more total utility for the group as a takings than any other alternative does (Boylan, 2009, p. 53) Those who practice utileism take into consideration all of the consequences and each action. Utilitarianism can be divided into two theories act and persist utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is the interpretation of utilitarianism that says that each moral land site should be subjected to the utilitarian formula the greatest good for the greatest number. (Boylan, 2009, p. 164) This view of respectable decision making seems to be the least emotional due to the fact that it is gauzy song in the equation. This might hurt one person just more people will benefit from it.Rule utilitarianism says that each moral situation should be guided first by prima facie rules (that themselves are warrant by utilitarianism). Thus, the agent assesses a situation on act utilitarian principles but wi thin a framework of prima facie rules that can countermand apparent act-utilitarian outcomes. (Boylan, 2009, p. 164) Unlike, act utilitarianism, rule utilitarianism considers injustices of an individual for the greater good whereas act utilitarianism does not. Deontology is the moral theory that suggests that an agents duty is based upon principle.The theory bases its duties on the reputation of human reason or on the nature of human action. It asserts the existence of moral facts and so is a moral realist theory. (Boylan, 2009, p. 171) This idea goes along with the notion that each person has a built in moral code. A person will do the right liaison even though they know there will consequences. There are similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. Each theory has its own ideas regarding ethics and morality regarding the individual and participation.Consequences and benefits differ with each theory. Virtue theory states that va let de chambre have virtues for the sake of what is good and right and these virtues are the supreme human good. Virtues drive our tendencies for behavior and control how we feel and interpet things. Living a good life is living a virtuous life within society. A persons actions are the direct results and reflection of an individuals morals and virtues. Utilitarian theory is relate with the maximum benefit or good for the greatest number of people.The outcome with the greatest benefits for greatest numbers is always the desired result. However, the greatest good for the mass should not come at the expense of harming the minority. The minority may have to endure nearly individual sacrifice so that the greatest numbers in society can realize the greatest good. Deontology is concerned with the meaning behind ethical decisions and conduct instead of end results or outcome. It looks at how an individual is make to act in terms of right and wrong conduct.It is the individuals duty and obligation to follow the law and it is acceptable to harm close to people for the greater good and benefit. Utilitarian theory is less concerned with the individual because all that matters is an outcome the benefits the most people. It focuses more on actions of the legal age to create the greatest good and outcome. However, there is always a minority and those people will not always benefit under this system. The majority needs to have good values and morals for society to thunder and benefit. Virtue and deontology theories have more focus on the individual and.