Community Health Advocacy Essay

The aspects of federation and unite ar closely connected and mickle die hard to habit the confines inter shiftably. The best way to explain the expiration between the two concepts is by examples to differentiate and get a cle atomic bod 18r collar of the difference between the two concepts. This piece will define add up and federation giving a brief support from current literature. The paper will also examine and give the differences between the two bounds plus describe and identify the chosen aggregate based on the wellness issue of philia disease. The Christoffels three full points of a abstract cloth for protagonism will be described. Then each peak as an aggregate selected is described.Community and Aggregate Terms DefinesIn confederation wellness negociate nursing, aggregate is defined as the whole existence, which is be apply to describe a given environment. The term aggregate is used to refer or define a group of people in a society who ar believed t o hold similar or commonality jobs and challenges in their life. These people should share similar characteristics and also they should be living(a) in the alike(p) area. The group which is to be described should be twinge from the same medical or health accusation problem and should be in search of similar medication or health criminal maintenance services. Aggregate in nursing setting literally is defined as the entire, whole, or the sum of a given group with similar problems, (Nies & McEwen, 2010).Differences in the midst of Aggregate and Community in that note are those people who use the term community when referring to aggregate. Aggregate and community are two different concepts that are closely connected. Community in nursing health care setting is used to refer to the general population in a given area. A community is the entirepopulation that includes the dour and well-grounded population. When discussing slightly the aggregate, we refer to the population, wh ich is experiencing a health condition along with those who are responsible of taking care of the group that are sick. The entire population that comprise of healthy and sick in the society is referred to as the community, (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2009).identify Aggregate and Description as a health IssueThere are those people who use the term community and the term aggregate to refer to the same thing or to rigorous something the same. There theme signifi piece of asst differences between the term community and the term aggregate. When we talk of aggregate, we are referring to a population, which has similar medical problems or challenges and live in the same region or geographical area. For the community, its the general population that involves the sick and those who are not sick. In this case, Adults suffering from heart disease in Illinois is an aggregate population that is used to define the current health care challenges. In the state of Illinois, detailally the Sangamon cou nty community, evidence shows that heart disease is the number one reason for death of adults in the entire state of Illinois and in Sangamon county (Illinois Department of cosmos Health IDPH, 2010).Christoffels Three Stages of a abstract Framework for Advocacy Christoffels three orders for advocacy include info, strategy, and action. The stratums flash place concurrently. The beginning stage, data, includes naming, describing, and measuring the frequent health problem. The second stage, strategy, involves using the information in the first stage to break down a excogitate of action for the promotion of public health. The stage includes. This stage involves the communication of information to the public and health care professionals. Groups can then be assembled to counsel on the issue and object needed changes. Strategies can include public education messages, campaigns, and press conferences. This action may involve fund raising, persuading individuals to change the ir lives, and rule involvement.To achieve action, changes in mindsets, behaviors, and resource provision. Public health advocacy transpires at two levels the individual/family level and in the larger community level (Christoffel,2000). Advocacy that focuses on the interpersonal or intrapersonal level is much referred to as patient advocacy. Patient advocacy involves any activity that benefits a patient (Torrey, 2010). It can apply individual patient care, groups that develop policies, and legislation changes to improve the health care system for patients. There are some(prenominal) examples of patient advocacy organizations, which include government groups such as the core group for Disease Control, American Heart Association, and individual patient advocates who act as healthcare assistants (Torrey, 2010).Applying Each Stage as an advocate for the AggregateThe first stage in the Christoffels advocacy framework talks about the information factor. The information names, describes , and measures the public health problem. When discussing the issue of heart disease. This stage can be used to describe the disease process, the risk factors intricate, and its complications. During this stage, the private sector or the government sector get involved so as to develop the research needed that can be used to measure the public health problem. Evidence shows that this stage is relevant simply because it assists develop all statistical information and results that are fit in order to address the advocacy challenge. The first stage in Christoffels advocacy framework is to develop a research on heart disease within the society. This stage will help develop relevant information on the mortality rate related to heart disease and/or its complications (Christoffel, 2000).The second stage in Christoffels advocacy framework is the stage of strategy. Having collected relevant information about the problem of health care issue, the second stage helps work on the information s o as to understand the problem completely. In this stage, the central thought process is to get results that will help come up with some strategies on how to approach the health problem. Experts in respective fields translate the research findings so that proper results are developed to develop a plan of action (Christoffel, 2011).The third stage in Christoffels advocacy framework is the stage of action. Strategies, which are developed in the second stage on how to handle thehealth issue are implemented and monitored in the lowest stage of Christoffels advocacy framework (Christoffel, 2011). It is alleged that when strategies in stage two are implemented and monitored they provide the best results in respect to the health care environment, (Stanhope & Lancaster, 2009). Public health messages on the news and posters can help educate the community about heart disease. There are also local physicians who provide free learning seminars on specific diseases. Raising funds to help with campaign measures can also be implemented during this stage. Legislation can be educated on the health issue to convince policy makers to get involved. The main part of this stage is action. The goal is to influence people to change specific habits that will slew the risk of developing heart disease.ConclusionThe aspects of community and aggregate are closely connected, and in most cases a lot of people tend to use them interchangeably. These two terms are used interchangeably, but they have different meanings. There are those people who use the term community and the term aggregate to refer to the same thing or to mean something the same. There stand significant differences between the term community and the term aggregate. Aggregate is the populations that has similar health problems and are seeking similar health care services, but the community is the entire population that carries the sick and the healthy. The use of Christoffels advocacy framework helps solve a problem in acc ordance.ReferencesChristoffel, K. (2011). Public health Advocacy Process and Product. American Journal of Public Health Illinois Department of Public Health. (2010). Leading causes of death, Illinois, 2010. Retrieved from http//www.idph.state.il.us/health/bdmd/leadingdeaths10.htm Nies, M. (Mary Albrecht), & McEwen, M. (2010). Community/public health nursing promoting the health of populations. Elsevier/Saunders Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. (2009). Foundations of nursing in the community community-oriented practice. Mosby/Elsevier